1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 6 F.Supp.
  5. 6 F.Supp. 393 (1934)
 

SHIMADZU v. ELECTRIC STORAGE BATTERY CO.

No. 7727.

6 F.Supp. 393 (1934)

SHIMADZU et al. v. ELECTRIC STORAGE BATTERY CO.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

February 5, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph W. Henderson, of Philadelphia, Pa., James T. Newton, of Washington, D. C., E. B. Whitcomb, of Toledo, Ohio, and Geo. Whitefield Betts, Jr., of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Augustus B. Stoughton and Edward S. W. Farnum, Jr., both of Philadelphia, Pa., A. F. Kwis, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Hugh Morris, of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

In this patent infringement suit plaintiff has moved for an inspection of the defendant's processes, methods, and products and of its apparatus in actual operation.

Although infrequently exercised, there is very little doubt or difficulty about the power of a court of equity to order the disclosure by physical inspection of evidence in the defendant's possession. The following well-settled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases