1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 12 F.Supp.
  5. 12 F.Supp. 295 (1934)
 

HARRY BIERSCHENK CO. v. GOESS

12 F.Supp. 295 (1934)

HARRY BIERSCHENK CO., Inc., v. GOESS.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 6, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Freedman, Loewenstein & Freedman, of New York City, for plaintiff.

O'Brien, Boardman, Conboy, Memhard & Early, of New York City, for defendant.

KNOX, District Judge.

This motion is denied. In my opinion, complainant is not entitled to be subrogated to the rights either of the Collector of Customs, or of the United States, by reason of anything contained in section 198 of title 19 of the U. S. Code Annotated. The provisions of the statute were designed to protect the United States, and are not intended to favor persons who seek to take advantage of the conveniences...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases