1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 9 F.Supp.
  5. 9 F.Supp. 225 (1934)
 

IN RE TURNER

9 F.Supp. 225 (1934)

In re TURNER. SEAY et ux. v. McCAUGHEY.

District Court, S. D. Mississippi, S. D.

December 22, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Luther A. Smith, of Hattiesburg, Miss., for petitioner.

Hannah & Simrall, of Hattiesburg, Miss., for trustee.

HOLMES, District Judge.

The referee allowed petitioners' claim for damages respecting a contract for future rents, but denied priority of payment. The sole question presented by the petition to review is the correctness of this ruling. It involves a construction of clause 7, par. a, § 103, title 11, USCA, providing what debts may be proved against the estate of a bankrupt; of clause 7, par. b, § 104, title 11, US CA, designating the debts to have priority...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases