1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 7 F.Supp.
  5. 7 F.Supp. 214 (1934)
 

CHESAPEAKE & POTOMAC TELEPHONE CO. v. WEST

No. 2240.

7 F.Supp. 214 (1934)

CHESAPEAKE & POTOMAC TELEPHONE CO. OF BALTIMORE CITY v. WEST et al.

District Court, D. Maryland.

May 11, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles McHenry Howard (of Venable, Baetjer & Howard), of Baltimore, Md., Raymond S. Williams (of Hershey, Donaldson & Williams), of Baltimore, Md., Ralph A. Van Orsdel and T. Baxter Milne, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Richard F. Cleveland, Herman M. Moser, and John Henry Lewin, all of Baltimore, Md., for defendants.

Randolph Barton, Jr. (of Barton, Wilmer, Ambler & Barton), of Baltimore, Md., and Forrest Bramble, of Baltimore, Md., for Retail Merchants' Ass'n.

Before SOPER, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAM C. COLEMAN and CHESNUT, District Judges.

Findings of Fact.

The above-entitled case having come on to be heard on the pleadings, on the application of the plaintiff for a preliminary injunction (and the parties having stipulated that on the evidence to be produced there should also be a final decree on the merits) and the parties having appeared by their respective counsel and offered evidence in support of their respective contentions; the Court having heard arguments and being advised in the premises...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases