1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 9 F.Supp.
  5. 9 F.Supp. 181 (1934)
 

BALTIMORE & O. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 305.

9 F.Supp. 181 (1934)

BALTIMORE & O. R. CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, E. D. Virginia.

December 1, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. D. Boynton, of New Haven, Conn., Thos. P. Healy, of New York City, M. Carter Hall and E. Randolph Williams, both of Richmond, Va., T. H. Willcox, of Norfolk, Va., Joseph F. Eshelman, of Philadelphia, Pa., and Elmer L. Beach, of Richmond, Va., for petitioners and intervening petitioners.

Elmer B. Collins, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for the United States.

D. W. Knowlton and E. M. Reidy, both of Washington, D. C., for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Charles Clark, W. N. McGehee, W. L. Grubbs, and Frank W. Gwathmey, all of Washington, D. C., for southern carriers, intervening defendants.

Before SOPER, Circuit Judge, and WAY and CHESNUT, District Judges.

SOPER, Circuit Judge.

This suit in equity was brought under the provisions of the Act of October 22, 1913, c. 32, 38 Stat. 219 (28 USCA § 41 (28) and §§ 43-46), to enjoin, set aside, and annul certain orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, in which the Commission prescribed divisions, as between northern and southern carriers, of the through rates on Florida citrus fruit moving by railroad to destinations in official classification territory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases