1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 6 F.Supp.
  5. 6 F.Supp. 156 (1934)
 

RICHARD v. NATIONAL CITY BANK

6 F.Supp. 156 (1934)

RICHARD v. NATIONAL CITY BANK OF NEW YORK.

District Court, S. D. New York.

February 20, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Engelhard, Pollak, Pitcher & Stern, of New York City (Walter H. Pollak, Frederic C. Pitcher, and Ruth I. Wilson, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Shearman & Sterling, of New York City (Joseph M. Proskauer, Philip A. Carroll, Otey McClellan, and M. V. Voorhies, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

PATTERSON, District Judge.

The question is whether the provision of the Glass-Steagall Banking Act permitting the removal of certain actions against national banks from state courts to the District Court (Act June 16, 1933, c. 88, § 15; [12 USCA § 632]) applies to suits pending in a state court at the time when the act took effect.

The relevant portion of the statute reads:

Section 25 (b). "Notwithstanding any other provision of law all suits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases