1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 4 F.Supp.
  5. 4 F.Supp. 991 (1933)
 

MORRIS v. WISCONSIN HYDRO ELECTRIC CO.

4 F.Supp. 991 (1933)

MORRIS et al. v. WISCONSIN HYDRO ELECTRIC CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 28, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, of New York City, for the motion.

Miner W. Tuttle, of New York City (Melvin G. Palliser and William C. Gehring, both of New York City, of counsel), opposed.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

This motion is in all respects denied.

Now that I am satisfied that I have jurisdiction of the second cause of action because the aggregate amount claimed therein, together with the amount claimed in the first cause of action, is far above the necessary amount to give this court jurisdiction, cf. Kaus v. American Surety Company (D. C.) 199 F. 972, 975, my only concern herein has been the locus standi of the plaintiffs Hugh M. Morris...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases