1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 3 F.Supp.
  5. 3 F.Supp. 973 (1933)
 

E. EDELMAN & CO. v. FREDERICKS ARMATURE MFG. CO.

No. 995.

3 F.Supp. 973 (1933)

E. EDELMAN & CO. v. FREDERICKS ARMATURE MFG. CO. et al.

District Court, M. D. Pennsylvania.

June 21, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Welles, Mumford & Stark, of Scranton, Pa., for plaintiff.

Henry Hipple and M. E. Haggerty, both of Lock Haven, Pa., for defendants.

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is a bill in equity to enjoin the defendants from using the names "Fredericks Armature Manufacturing Company," "Fredericks Armature Corporation," or "Fredericks," or any substitution therefor, from soliciting customers of the Fredericks Armature Corporation for the sale of armatures or coils, from receiving mail addressed to the Fredericks Armature Corporation and from doing any act or deed detrimental to the right of the complainant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases