STANLEY CO. OF AMERICA v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TEL. CO.

Nos. 985, 996, 997.

4 F.Supp. 80 (1933)

STANLEY CO. OF AMERICA, Inc., v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. et al. GENERAL TALKING PICTURES CORPORATION v. SAME. DUOVAC RADIO CORPORATION v. SAME.

District Court, D. Delaware.

June 28, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and George E. Quigley, both of New York City, for plaintiff Stanley Co. of America. Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and Ephraim Berliner, both of New York City, for plaintiff General Talking Pictures Corporation.

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, for plaintiff Duovac Radio Corporation.

George F. Hurd (of Greene & Hurd), of New York City, and C. M. Bracelen and John H. Ray, both of New York City, and Marvel, Morford, Ward & Logan, of Wilmington, Del., for defendants.


NIELDS, District Judge.

Motions for preliminary injunctions are made on behalf of plaintiffs in three equity suits brought under section 16 of the Clayton Act (15 USCA § 26) to restrain defendants from alleged violations of section 3 of that act (15 USCA § 14) and of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act (15 US CA §§ 1, 2).

In their main brief plaintiffs state the measure of relief sought by these motions for preliminary injunctions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases