1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 4 F.Supp.
  5. 4 F.Supp. 763 (1933)
 

SUISMAN & BLUMENTHAL v. EATON

No. 3554.

4 F.Supp. 763 (1933)

SUISMAN & BLUMENTHAL, INC., v. EATON, Collector of Internal Revenue.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

August 23, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry M. Gretsch, of New York City (Louis E. Spiegler, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for plaintiff.

John Buckley, U. S. Atty., and George H. Cohen, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Hartford, Conn. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and S. E. Blackham, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for defendant.

HINCKS, District Judge.

This is an action at law brought to recover the sum of $234.23, collected, it is claimed, illegally, on account of an excess profits tax liability for 1917.

The case has been submitted to the court upon an agreed statement of facts, from which the following appear:

Suisman & Blumenthal on August 31, 1917, was a partnership which will hereinafter be referred to as the "partnership." On said date the partnership was dissolved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases