1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 674 (1933)
 

HAZELTINE CORPORATION v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO.

5 F.Supp. 674 (1933)

HAZELTINE CORPORATION v. SEARS ROEBUCK & CO., Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

December 26, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City (Willis H. Taylor, Jr., and Baldwin Guild, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Clyde A. Norton and Stephen H. Philbin, both of New York City, for defendant.

FRANK J. COLEMAN, District Judge.

The three patents in suit relate to radio receiving sets, and are alleged to have particular importance in connection with single dial tuning. The first, No. 1,648,808, covers the tuned circuits generally, and purports to show a method of so constructing them that the separate tuning dials for the various circuits would have substantially similar readings; it does not, however, mention the possibility of unicontrol for all the circuits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases