1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 3 F.Supp.
  5. 3 F.Supp. 566 (1933)
 

SARGENT BARGE LINE v. NEW YORK SILK DYEING CO.

No. 12849.

3 F.Supp. 566 (1933)

SARGENT BARGE LINE v. NEW YORK SILK DYEING CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

March 20, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Purdy & Purdy, of New York City (Edmund F. Lamb, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Alexander, Ash & Jones, of New York City (Edward Ash, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent New York Silk Dyeing Co., Inc.

Thomas A. McDonald and Franklin M. Depew, both of New York City, for Jeuck.

INCH, District Judge.

The respondent New York Silk Dyeing Company, Inc., maintains a dock at Tenth street, College Point, in this district, where it received from time to time cargoes of coal consigned to it.

Libelant's barge Elsie with a cargo of coal consigned to said respondent arrived at this dock the morning of September 9, 1931, and was unloaded.

While the barge was at this dock it was damaged by contact with a half sunken float or raft. Libelant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases