1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 9 F.Supp.
  5. 9 F.Supp. 469 (1933)
 

OHIO ELECTRIC POWER CO. v. VILLAGE OF OBERLIN, OHIO

No. 4712.

9 F.Supp. 469 (1933)

OHIO ELECTRIC POWER CO. v. VILLAGE OF OBERLIN, OHIO, et al.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

December 22, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tracy, Chapman & Welles, of Toledo, Ohio, and Howell Wright, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Andrews, Hadden & Burton, of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.

WEST, District Judge.

Since this case was heard on motion to dismiss the bill, plaintiff has applied for a temporary injunction, and the matter being urgent, the case has been advanced for trial upon the merits and heard accordingly.

So far as the existing contract under Ordinance No. 37, by which plaintiff agreed to furnish and operate a street lighting system and supply current for the operation of a pumping plant for the village for ten years from January...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases