1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 3 F.Supp.
  5. 3 F.Supp. 460 (1933)
 

CANNING v. HACKETT

3 F.Supp. 460 (1933)

CANNING v. HACKETT et al.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

May 5, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James H. Vahey and Edwin J. Owens, both of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Abbott & Carroll, Daniel J. Lyne, and Lyne, Woodworth & Evarts, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant John J. Hackett.

BREWSTER, District Judge.

The plaintiff has filed a motion to restore this case to the docket. It involves the vacating of an order dismissing the action under rule 34 of this court for want of prosecution.

The facts appearing in the affidavit and assumed in argument are these:

On November 28, 1928, the action was brought in the state court. The action was duly removed to this court on January 23, 1929. James H. Vahey appeared as attorney of record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases