1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 7 F.Supp.
  5. 7 F.Supp. 446 (1933)
 

LINDBLADH CORPORATION v. C. E. SHEPPARD CO.

No. 5950.

7 F.Supp. 446 (1933)

LINDBLADH CORPORATION v. C. E. SHEPPARD CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

July 24, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Neave, of New York City (Harrison F. Lyman, Charles E. Hammett, Jr., and Fish, Richardson & Neave, all of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Stephen J. Cox, of New York City (B. G. Foster and Henry L. Foster, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for defendant.

GALSTON, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit in which infringement is alleged of letters patent No. 1,813,940 for a ruling machine granted July 14, 1931, on an application filed on September 17, 1921, and of patent No. 1,609,648 for a ruling apparatus granted December 7, 1926, on an application filed August 3, 1923. The inventor of these devices is Harmon E. Lindbladh, plaintiff's assignor.

The inventions covered by these patents relate to improvements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases