1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 2 F.Supp.
  5. 2 F.Supp. 375 (1933)
 

UNION SOLVENTS CORPORATION v. BUTACET CORPORATION

No. 992.

2 F.Supp. 375 (1933)

UNION SOLVENTS CORPORATION v. BUTACET CORPORATION et al.

District Court, D. Delaware.

January 17, 1933

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ayres J. Stockly, of Wilmington, Del., M. K. Hobbs and George I. Haight (of Haight, Adcock & Banning) both of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

Merrell E. Clark and Maxwell Barus (of Fish, Richardson & Neave), and Philip C. Peck, all of New York City, and William G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del., for defendants.

NIELDS, District Judge.

Union Solvents Corporation, a corporation of the state of Delaware, brought this bill to perpetuate testimony against the Butacet Corporation, a corporation of the state of Delaware, Guaranty Trust Company of New York, a corporation of the state of New York, and Commercial Solvents Corporation, a corporation of the state of Maryland.

The bill of complaint recites that in a suit for patent infringement wherein the present defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases