1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 3 F.Supp.
  5. 3 F.Supp. 330 (1933)
 

GOLDBERG v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES

No. 1021.

3 F.Supp. 330 (1933)

GOLDBERG v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES, Inc., et al.

District Court, D. Delaware.

May 1, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Berenson, of Boston, Mass., and John J. Morris, Jr., of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., for Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.

NIELDS, District Judge.

Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc., moves that the bill of complaint be dismissed for failing to meet the requirements of Equity Rule 25 (28 USCA § 723). That rule requires the stating part of a bill to be "a short and simple statement of the ultimate facts upon which the plaintiff asks relief, omitting any mere statement of evidence."

In the eighty typed pages of plaintiff's bill there are extended recitals of what purports

[undefined undefined undefined]

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases