1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 262 (1933)
 

CHENEY CO. v. CITY OF MEDFORD

Nos. 3667, 3668.

5 F.Supp. 262 (1933)

CHENEY CO. v. CITY OF MEDFORD et al. SAME v. E. VAN NOORDEN CO.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

November 20, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

No. 3667:

Louis A. Jones and Emery, Booth, Varney & Townsend, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Joseph H. Sharrillo and Peters & Sharrillo, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant City of Medford.

George P. Dike, Cedric W. Porter, and Macleod, Calver, Copeland & Dike, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant American Employers' Ins. Co.

No. 3668:

Louis A. Jones and Emery, Booth, Varney & Townsend, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

George P. Dike, Cedric W. Porter, and Macleod, Calver, Copeland & Dike, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

McLELLAN, District Judge.

These are two suits for infringement brought by the plaintiff, the Cheney Company; the first against the City of Medford and American Employers' Insurance Company; and the second against E. Van Noorden Company. The alleged facts of infringement were the same in both cases and they were tried together.

It was stipulated between the parties, and I find, that the plaintiff is now and continuously has been since the date of issuance thereof...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases