1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 4 F.Supp.
  5. 4 F.Supp. 236 (1933)
 

DANCIGER OIL & REFINING CO. OF TEXAS v. SMITH

No. 391.

4 F.Supp. 236 (1933)

DANCIGER OIL & REFINING CO. OF TEXAS et al. v. SMITH et al.

District Court, N. D. Texas, Amarillo Division.

As Amended on Denial of Rehearing August 3, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nelson Phillips, of Dallas, Tex., I. J. Ringoldsky and W. G. Boatright, both of Kansas City, Mo., and D. H. Culton and S. A. L. Morgan, both of Amarillo, Tex., for complainants.

James V. Allred, Atty. Gen., Willis E. Gresham and Maurice Cheek, Asst. Attys. Gen., and Robert E. Hardwicke, Sp. Counsel, of Ft. Worth, Tex., for defendants.

Before HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge, and WEST and WILSON, District Judges.

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs, producing and refining companies owned by the same interests, bring this bill to enjoin the orders of the commission limiting the production from wells of the oil and refining company in accordance with the proration orders promulgated for the Panhandle field.1

The petition alleged that the plaintiffs' wells were being produced to the full producing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases