1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 3 F.Supp.
  5. 3 F.Supp. 1020 (1933)
 

HOAD v. NEW YORK CENT. R. CO.

No. 1074A.

3 F.Supp. 1020 (1933)

HOAD v. NEW YORK CENT. R. CO. et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

July 11, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Searl & McElroy, of Syracuse, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Rann, Vaughan, Brown & Sturtevant, of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant New York Cent. R. Co.

Harold J. Adams, of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendant Pennsylvania R. Co.

KNIGHT, District Judge.

The action is in negligence. Each defendant sets up as one of its defenses a release by the plaintiff. Plaintiff replying alleges that such release was obtained through misrepresentation and that it is null and void. Each defendant now moves for an order directing that the issue as to validity of such release be tried separately from the issue of negligence.

Section 443 of the Civil Practice Act of New York State specifically provides...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases