1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 1 F.Supp.
  5. 1 F.Supp. 959 (1932)
 

SCHUMACHER v. DAVIS

No. 5032.

1 F.Supp. 959 (1932)

SCHUMACHER v. DAVIS et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

December 2, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Breed, Abbott & Morgan, of New York City (Hugh S. Williamson, Matthias Plum, Jr., and Edgardo A. Correa, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Henry D. Levy, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendant Michael Weinsier.

Furst, Schwartz & Schwager, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendants Julius Schwartz and Jacob Davis.

George J. Rudnick, of Brooklyn, N. Y. (Peter P. Smith, Julius Schwartz, Joseph Katz, Robert L. Callahan, and Samuel K. Goldstein, all of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant Morris Walzer.

GALSTON, District Judge.

This cause of action is brought by the plaintiff, as receiver of the Queensboro National Bank of the City of New York, against the defendants, as partners of the firm of Davis & Co.

The authority of the plaintiff arises out of his appointment by the Comptroller of the Currency under the banking laws of the United States (12 USCA § 191) because of the insolvency of the Queensboro National Bank of the City of New York.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases