AMERICAN BRAKE SHOE & FOUNDRY CO.
v.
INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO.
District Court, S. D. New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 18, 1932.
October 18, 1932.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Charles Franklin, of New York City, for plaintiff Benjamin F. Johnson et al.
Louis Boehm, of New York City, for Lillian Boehm, intervener.
Breed, Abbott & Morgan, of New York City, for the American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co.
James L. Quackenbush, of New York City, for Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Hughes, Schurman & Dwight, of New York City, for William Roberts, receiver of Manhattan Ry. Co.
Hornblower, Miller, Miller & Boston, of New York City, for receivers of Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed, of New York City, for the 7 Per Cent. Noteholders' Committee and 5 Per Cent. Bondholders' Committee, both committees of Interborough Rapid Transit Co. securities.
Root, Clark & Buckner, of New York City, for committee of Interborough Rapid Transit Co. Ten-Year 6 Per Cent. Gold Notes.
Cotton, Franklin, Wright & Gordon, of New York City, for Protective Committee of Manhattan Consolidated 4's.
Davies, Auerbach & Cornell, of New York City, for Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Webb, of New York City, for Chase Nat. Bank, trustee under Manhattan Ry. Co. second mortgage.
Marshall & Wehle, of New York City, for Harold Palmer et al., acting as Protective Committee for 7 Per Cent. Guaranteed stock of Manhattan Ry. Co.
District Court, S. D. New York.
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
Heretofore and on August 26, 1932, acting as Senior Circuit Judge of the second circuit in the above-entitled cause E 70 — 364, brought by the American Brake Shoe & Foundry Company as complainant, duly pending in equity in the District Court for the Southern District of New York, I appointed Messrs. Victor J. Dowling and Thomas E. Murray, Jr., as temporary receivers of the Interborough Rapid Transit Company, and by order entered on...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
