1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 1 F.Supp.
  5. 1 F.Supp. 643 (1932)
 

GOTHAM SILK HOSIERY CO. v. ARTCRAFT SILK HOSIERY MILLS

Nos. 890, 910.

1 F.Supp. 643 (1932)

GOTHAM SILK HOSIERY CO., Inc., v. ARTCRAFT SILK HOSIERY MILLS, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware.

October 28, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh M. Morris, of Wilmington, Del., and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., Edward W. Vaill, and A. I. Spiro, all of New York City, for plaintiff.

Caleb S. Layton, of Wilmington, Del., Clifton V. Edwards and Morris W. Pool, both of New York City, and Leon Edelson, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

NIELDS, District Judge.

These patent suits were brought by Gotham Silk Hosiery Company, Inc., against Artcraft Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc. They were tried together. In one, plaintiff charges defendant with infringement of Tilles patent, No. 1,824,636, for "Hosiery." In the other, plaintiff charges defendant with infringement of Buchsbaum patent, No. 1,728,924, for "Stocking." The defense to the Tilles patent is invalidity by reason of (a) lack of patentable novelty,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases