1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 1 F.Supp.
  5. 1 F.Supp. 63 (1932)
 

HARBICH v. HAMILTON-BROWN SHOE CO.

No. 57.

1 F.Supp. 63 (1932)

HARBICH et al. v. HAMILTON-BROWN SHOE CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. Texas, Victoria Division.

August 3, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Proctor, Vandenberge, Crain & Vandenberge and J. W. Ragsdale, all of Victoria, Tex., for plaintiffs.

Carl Wright Johnson and H. W. Moursund, both of San Antonio, Tex., and Arthur M. Green, of Victoria, Tex., for defendants.

KENNERLY, District Judge.

July 17, 1931, plaintiffs, alleged to be citizens of Texas, sued defendants (the Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company being alleged to be a "foreign corporation," and Crow being alleged to be a resident of Texas) in the district court of Victoria county, Tex., for damages for alleged personal injuries, etc., arising out of an alleged collision between an automobile owned and driven by plaintiffs, or one of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases