1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 9 F.Supp.
  5. 9 F.Supp. 210 (1932)
 

GENERAL BANKING CO. v. GORDON

No. 6783.

9 F.Supp. 210 (1932)

GENERAL BANKING CO. v. GORDON, Secretary of Banking, et al.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

On Reargument, June 8, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George E. Beechwood, of Conlen, La Brum & Beechwood, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

C. B. Wagoner and C. S. Wesley, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This cause was heard upon bill and answer. Consequently, the answer is to be taken as true in all particulars whether responsive to the bill or not (Leeds v. Marine Insurance Co., 2 Wheat. [15 U. S.] 380, 4 L. Ed. 266; Terral v. Burke Construction Co., 257 U.S. 529, 42 S.Ct. 188, 66 L. Ed. 352, 21 A. L. R. 186), and only such averments of the bill as are not controverted are to be taken as admitted.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases