1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 6 F.Supp.
  5. 6 F.Supp. 176 (1932)
 

HOOKLESS FASTENER CO. v. G. E. PRENTICE MFG. CO.

No. 2133.

6 F.Supp. 176 (1932)

HOOKLESS FASTENER CO. v. G. E. PRENTICE MFG. CO.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

On Rehearing September 29, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fish, Richardson & Neave, of New York City (Charles Neave and Merrell E. Clark, both of New York City, R. S. Kelley, of Meadville, Pa., and Bristol & White, of New Haven, Conn., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Roberts, Cushman & Woodberry, of Boston, Mass. (Robert Cushman and Richard F. Walker, both of Boston, Mass., and Drury W. Cooper, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

HINCKS, District Judge.

This is a suit brought for the infringement of two letters patent, as follows: Patent No. 1,566,996, issued to one Sundback on December 22, 1925, upon an application filed May 8, 1923; and Patent No. 1,598,183, issued to one Whitney on August 31, 1926, upon an application filed March 30, 1925. The plaintiff relies upon claims 1 to 4, 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, and 21 of the Sundback patent; and upon claims Nos. 1 to 6 of the Whitney...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases