1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 3 F.Supp.
  5. 3 F.Supp. 134 (1932)
 

UNITED STATES v. FLORES

No. 4932.

3 F.Supp. 134 (1932)

UNITED STATES v. FLORES.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

On Motion on Reargument, November 7, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. W. Wells, U. S. Atty., of Philadelphia, Pa.

John V. Lovitt, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

The question discussed in this case would be a very interesting one if it had not been set at rest by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in the case of Mathues v. United States ex rel. Maro, 27 F.2d 518. A procedural difficulty might be thought to intervene, in that the question discussed is sought to be raised by demurrer. All desire, however, the real point made to be met regardless of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases