1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 61 F.2d
  5. 61 F.2d 1017 (1932)
 

PORTER v. PORTER

No. 5573.

61 F.2d 1017 (1932)

Jesse Ellis PORTER, Appellant, v. Mary S. PORTER, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.

Decided December 12, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edwin C. Dutton and Hallock P. Long, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

S. McComas Hawken and Raymond Neudecker, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and VAN ORSDEL and GRONER, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

The only question for our consideration in this case is whether the evidence was sufficient on which to predicate a decree for absolute divorce.

Appellant was sued for divorce and charged with adultery. Judge Bailey, who heard the case in the court below, decided the evidence was sufficient to establish the commission of the adultery. He saw the witnesses, and had full opportunity to observe their demeanor and judge of their veracity. Ordinarily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases