1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 281 U.S.
  5. 281 U.S. 66 (1930)
 

CARLEY & HAMILTON v. SNOOK

Nos. 86 and 267.

281 U.S. 66 (1930)

50 S.Ct. 204

74 L.Ed. 704

CARLEY & HAMILTON, INC., ET AL. v. SNOOK, CHIEF OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COTTINGHAM ET AL. v. SAME.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 24, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. W.R. Crawford and Edwin C. Ewing, with whom Mr. J.F. Vizzard was on the brief, submitted for Carley & Hamilton, Inc., et al., appellants.

Messrs. W.R. Crawford and Henry Hotchkiss, with whom Mr. J.F. Vizzard was on the brief, submitted for Cottingham, et al., appellants.

Messrs. U.S. Webb, Attorney General of California, and William F. Cleary, Deputy Attorney General, with whom Alberta Belford was on the brief, for Snook, appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE STONE delivered the opinion of the Court.

These are appeals under § 266 of the Judicial Code, from final decrees of District Courts of three judges for the Northern District of California. Each, on motion to dismiss the complaint, dissolved a temporary injunction, dismissed the complaint and upheld the constitutionality of § 77 (b) and (c) of the Motor Vehicle Act of California, 1923 California Statutes, c. 266, as amended, 1927 California Statutes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases