1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 278 U.S.
  5. 278 U.S. 358 (1929)
 

ORIEL v. RUSSELL

Nos. 92 and 91.

278 U.S. 358 (1929)

49 S.Ct. 173

73 L.Ed. 419

ORIEL ET AL. v. RUSSELL, TRUSTEE. PRELA v. HUBSHMAN, TRUSTEE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 14, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Hugo Levy for petitioners in No. 92.

Mr. Benjamin Siegel for respondent in No. 92.

Mr. Archibald Palmer, with whom Mr. Max L. Rosenstein was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 91.

Mr. George L. Cohen for respondent in No. 91.

Mr. CHIEF JUSTICE TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

These are writs of certiorari to orders of commitment of bankrupts for contempt, one in No. 92 of Harry Oriel and Joseph Confino, and the other in No. 91 of Samuel Prela, made by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, and affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. They were heard together.

In the Oriel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases