1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 30 F.2d
  5. 30 F.2d 101 (1929)
 

ERIE R. CO. v. GORDON

No. 3804.

30 F.2d 101 (1929)

ERIE R. CO. v. GORDON.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

January 11, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hobart & Minard, of Newark, N. J. (George S. Hobart and John E. Selser, both of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for appellant.

Harley, Cox & Walburg, of Newark, N. J. (John McNaughton, of Pompton Lakes, N. J., and Harry E. Walburg, of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for appellee.

Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The court below submitted this case to the jury. The real question, and we think the sole question, here on review, is whether there was enough evidence that the decedent was a passenger (actual or intended) to warrant its submission. Certainly he was either an intended passenger, a licensee, or a trespasser, and the railroad company owed him a duty according to his status in one of these three relations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases