1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 17 F.2d
  5. 17 F.2d 661 (1926)
 

ERIE TAXI CO. v. GNICHTEL

17 F.2d 661 (1926)

ERIE TAXI CO. v. GNICHTEL, Internal Revenue Collector, et al.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

December 3, 1926.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Surosky & Surosky, of Paterson, N. J., for complainant.

Walter G. Winne, U. S. Atty., of Hackensack, N. J., for defendants.

BODINE, District Judge.

This is a bill to restrain the collection of taxes. Revised Statutes, § 3224 (Comp. St. § 5947) sought to avoid such interference with the machinery of government. See Graham v. Dupont, 262 U.S. 234, 43 S.Ct. 567, 67 L. Ed. 965.

The return, upon which the taxes in question were assessed, was for the year 1919, and must have been made in the year 1920. The collector had, under the statute, five...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases