1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 266 U.S.
  5. 266 U.S. 497 (1925)
 

HYGRADE PROVISION CO. v. SHERMAN

Nos. 104-106.

266 U.S. 497 (1925)

45 S.Ct. 141

69 L.Ed. 402

HYGRADE PROVISION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. v. SHERMAN, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. LEWIS & FOX COMPANY v. SHERMAN, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. SATZ v. SHERMAN, AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 5, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David L. Podell, with whom Mr. Benjamin S. Kirsh was on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Samuel H. Hofstadter, with whom Mr. H.H. Nordlinger was on the brief, for Sherman, Attorney General, appellee.

Mr. Felix C. Benvenga, with whom Mr. Charles Henry was on the brief, for Banton, District Attorney, appellee.

MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

These appeals challenge the constitutionality of cc. 580 and 581, 2 Laws of New York, 1922, pp. 1314-1315, as being in contravention of the due process and equal protection of the law clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and the commerce clause of the Constitution of the United States. So far as these cases are concerned, the statutes are substantially alike, and it is enough to refer to c. 581 which provides...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases