1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 265 U.S.
  5. 265 U.S. 388 (1924)
 

GNERICH v. RUTTER

No. 79.

265 U.S. 388 (1924)

44 S.Ct. 532

68 L.Ed. 1068

GNERICH ET AL., COPARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE FIRM NAME OF B. & S. DRUG COMPANY v. RUTTER, AS PROHIBITION DIRECTOR IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 2, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry G. McKannay, with whom Mr. Louis V. Crowley was on the brief, for appellants.

Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. Mahlon D. Kiefer were on the brief, for appellee.

MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a suit for an injunction against the federal prohibition director for California restraining him from giving effect to a particular restriction embodied in a permit, issued under the National Prohibition Act, authorizing the plaintiffs, who are licensed pharmacists conducting a general drug business in San Francisco, to use and sell in such business intoxicating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases