1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 261 U.S.
  5. 261 U.S. 330 (1923)
 

PULLMAN CO. v. RICHARDSON

Nos. 143-148, and 149.

261 U.S. 330 (1923)

43 S.Ct. 366

67 L.Ed. 682

PULLMAN COMPANY v. RICHARDSON, AS TREASURER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. HINES, AS DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, ET AL. v. RICHARDSON, AS TREASURER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 12, 1923.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Cordenio A. Severance, with whom Mr. Gustavus A. Fernald and Mr. Burke Corbet were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. U.S. Webb, Attorney General of the State of California, and Mr. Raymond Benjamin, for defendant in error, submitted.

MR. JUSTICE VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.

These were actions by the Pullman Company against the Treasurer of California to recover moneys paid under protest as state taxes. Each action related to a designated part of the tax for a distinct year and was brought on the theory that the part designated was invalid because imposed under constitutional and statutory provisions repugnant to the Constitution of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases