1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 259 U.S.
  5. 259 U.S. 503 (1922)
 

WARD & GOW v. KRINSKY

No. 343.

259 U.S. 503 (1922)

42 S.Ct. 529

66 L.Ed. 1033

WARD & GOW v. KRINSKY ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 5, 1922.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Herman S. Hertwig for plaintiff in error.

Mr. E. Clarence Aiken, with whom Mr. Charles D. Newton, Attorney General of the State of New York, was on the brief, for the State Industrial Commission, defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE PITNEY delivered the opinion of the court.

The New York Workmen's Compensation Law of 1913-1914 [Laws 1913, c. 816; Laws 1914, cc. 41 and 316] sustained as constitutional against attacks based on the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment in New York Central R.R. Co. v. White, 243 U.S. 188, after several amendments was further amended by c. 634 of the Laws of 1918, which added...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases