1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 256 U.S.
  5. 256 U.S. 129 (1921)
 

MILLER & LUX v. SACRAMENTO & SAN JOAQUIN DRAINAGE DIST.

No. 347.

256 U.S. 129 (1921)

41 S.Ct. 404

65 L.Ed. 859

MILLER & LUX, INCORPORATED, v. SACRAMENTO & SAN JOAQUIN DRAINAGE DISTRICT.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 11, 1921.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward F. Treadwell for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Charles S. Peery, with whom Mr. Jeremiah F. Sullivan was on the brief, for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause is here upon writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. 182 California, 252. There is also an application for certiorari, but under the settled practice no adequate grounds therefor are shown.

By the Act of May 26, 1913, effective August 10, 1913 (Stats. 1913, p. 252), the legislature of California undertook to create the Sacramento...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases