1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 252 U.S.
  5. 252 U.S. 436 (1920)
 

BLUMENSTOCK BROS. ADVERTISING AGENCY v. CURTIS PUB. CO.

No. 197.

252 U.S. 436 (1920)

40 S.Ct. 385

64 L.Ed. 649

BLUMENSTOCK BROTHERS ADVERTISING AGENCY v. CURTIS PUBLISHING COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 19, 1920.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Colin C.H. Fyffe for plaintiff in error. Mr. Paul N. Dale and Mr. David R. Clarke were on the brief.

Mr. Amos C. Miller for defendant in error. Mr. Sidney S. Gorham, Mr. Henry W. Wales and Mr. Gilbert Noxon were on the brief.

MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court.

This suit was brought by the Blumenstock Brothers Advertising Agency against the Curtis Publishing Company in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois to recover treble damages under § 7 of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. 26 Stat. 209. The case here concerns the question of the jurisdiction of the District Court. Judicial Code, §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases