1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 248 U.S.
  5. 248 U.S. 272 (1919)
 

ANDREWS v. VIRGINIAN RY. CO.

No. 82.

248 U.S. 272 (1919)

39 S.Ct. 101

63 L.Ed. 236

ANDREWS, ADMINISTRATRIX OF ANDREWS, v. VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 7, 1919.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. A.P. Staples and Mr. A.B. Hunt for plaintiff in error.

Mr. H.T. Hall and Mr. G.A. Wingfield, with whom Mr. E.W. Knight and Mr. W.H.T. Loyall were on the brief, for defendant in error.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE, after making the foregoing statement of the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

At the threshold, there arises a question of our jurisdiction which we may not overlook and which we must therefore decide. The question is, has this court power by writ of error to review the judgment below; or, in other words, is the authority of the court to review that judgment confined by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726, to the right...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases