1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 249 U.S.
  5. 249 U.S. 134 (1919)
 

ARKADELPHIA CO. v. ST. LOUIS S.W. RY. CO.

Nos. 92, 93, 94, 95.

249 U.S. 134 (1919)

39 S.Ct. 237

63 L.Ed. 517

ARKADELPHIA MILLING COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. HASTY ET AL., COMPOSING THE PARTNERSHIP OF J.F. HASTY & SONS, v. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY. ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. SOUTHERN COTTON OIL COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 3, 1919.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. W.E. Hemingway, Mr. G.B. Rose, Mr. D.H. Cantrell and Mr. J.F. Loughborough for appellants in Nos. 92 and 93, and appellee in Nos. 94 and 95.

Mr. John M. Moore and Mr. George A. McConnell for appellees in Nos. 92 and 93, and appellants in Nos. 94 and 95.

MR. JUSTICE PITNEY delivered the opinion of the court.

These four cases were consolidated for the purposes of the hearing in the District Court, and have been treated as consolidated for the purposes of the hearing on appeal. They are so closely related that they may be dealt with in a single opinion.

On July 18, 1908, the two railway companies concerned — the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases