1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 240 U.S.
  5. 240 U.S. 387 (1916)
 

PITNEY v. WASHINGTON

No. 242.

240 U.S. 387 (1916)

36 S.Ct. 385

60 L.Ed. 703

PITNEY v. STATE OF WASHINGTON.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 6, 1916.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Louis Marshall, with whom Mr. Sol. M. Stroock was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Dallas V. Halverstadt and Mr. Blackburn Esterline, with whom Mr. W.V. Tanner, Attorney General of the State of Washington, and Mr. Alfred H. Lundin were on the brief, for defendant in error.1

MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court.

A companion case with Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis, ante, p. 342, and Tanner v. Little, ante, p. 369. It was argued and submitted with those cases and involves the same general questions and the validity of the statute passed upon in the latter case.

A criminal information was filed in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for the County of King charging that the United...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases