1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 241 U.S.
  5. 241 U.S. 211 (1916)
 

MINN. & ST. LOUIS R.R. v. BOMBOLIS

No. 478.

241 U.S. 211 (1916)

36 S.Ct. 595

60 L.Ed. 961

MINNEAPOLIS & ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY v. BOMBOLIS, ADMINISTRATOR OF NANOS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 22, 1916.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederick M. Miner, with whom Mr. William H. Bremner was on the brief, for plaintiff in error:1

Mr. George H. Lamar, with whom Mr. B.F. Proctor, Mr. C.U. McElroy and Mr. D.W. Wright were on the brief, for defendant in error.

These cases are as follows: Minneapolis & St. Louis R.R. v. Bombolis; St. Louis & San Franciso Railroad v. Brown, post, p. 223; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. Carnahan, post, p. 241; Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Stewart, post, p. 261; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. Kelly's Administrator, post, p. 000; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway v. Gainey, post, p. 000.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

Counting upon the Employers' Liability Act of 1908 (c. 149, 35 Stat. 65) as amended by the act of 1910 (c. 143, 36 Stat. 291), the defendant in error sued in a state court to recover for the loss resulting from the death of Nanos, his intestate, alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the plaintiff in error while he, Nanos, was in its employ and engaged in interstate commerce.

Whatever...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases