1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 239 U.S.
  5. 239 U.S. 175 (1915)
 

HEIM v. McCALL

No. 386.

239 U.S. 175 (1915)

36 S.Ct. 78

60 L.Ed. 206

HEIM v. McCALL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 29, 1915.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas F. Conway for plaintiff in error.

Mr. James F. McKenney, for plaintiffs in error Cranford Company and others, in No. 386, and for plaintiff in error in No. 388, argued simultaneously herewith, submitted.

Mr. George S. Coleman for defendants in error in No. 386, and Mr. Robert S. Johnstone, with whom Mr. Charles Albert Perkins, District Attorney of New York County, and Mr. George Z. Medale were on the brief, for defendants in error in No. 388 argued simultaneously herewith.

After stating the case as above, MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court.

There seems to have been no question raised as to the right of Heim to maintain the suit, although he is not one of the contractors nor a laborer of the excluded nationality or citizenship. The Appellate Division felt that there might be objection to the right, under the holding of a cited case. The Court of Appeals, however, made no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases