1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 223 U.S.
  5. 223 U.S. 376 (1912)
 

ARRENDONDO v. ARRENDONDO

No. 159.

223 U.S. 376 (1912)

32 S.Ct. 277

56 L.Ed. 476

CUEBAS Y ARREDONDO v. CUEBAS Y ARREDONDO.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 19, 1912.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederick L. Cornwell and Mr. N.B.K. Pettingill, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellees.

Mr. F. Kingbury Curtis and Mr. Henry A. Stickney, by leave of the court, filed a brief as amici curiae on behalf of Banco Territorial y Agricola.

MR. JUSTICE LURTON, after stating the facts as above, delivered the opinion of the court.

The bank is not a party to this appeal. The appellant has elected to dismiss her bill, both as to it and the other Porto Rican defendant, Antongiorgi, for the express purpose of creating jurisdiction of a suit between complainant, a citizen of the Island of Porto Rico, and the remaining original defendant, Felipe Cuebas, a citizen of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases