1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 212 U.S.
  5. 212 U.S. 568 (1909)
 

VALDES v. MUNICH

Nos. 457, 473, 474, Motions to dismiss or affirm.

212 U.S. 568 (1909)

29 S.Ct. 692

53 L.Ed. 654

VALDES v. MUNICH. SAME v. WOOD. SAME v. PERIANES.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 1, 1909.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Willis Sweet for defendant in error in Nos. 457 and 473, and Mr. Willis Sweet and Mr. Joseph Anderson, Jr., for defendant in error in No. 474, in support of the motion.

Mr. F. Kingsbury Curtis, Mr. John G. Carlisle and Mr. Henry A. Stickney in Nos. 457 and 474; Mr. F. Kingsbury Curtis and Mr. Henry A. Stickney in No. 473 for plaintiff in error, in opposition.

Per Curiam:

Writs of error dismissed for want of jurisdictional amounts. Act of April 12, 1900, c. 191, 31 Stat. 77, § 34, 35; Act of March 2, 1901, c. 812, 31 Stat. 953, § 3; Royal Insurance Company v. Martin, 192 U.S. 149, 159; Ortega v. Lara, 202 U.S. 339; Perez v. Fernandez, 202 U.S. 80; Garrozi v. Dastas...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases