1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 215 U.S.
  5. 215 U.S. 122 (1909)
 

HANOVER NATIONAL BANK v. SUDDATH (NO. 2)

No. 13.

215 U.S. 122 (1909)

30 S.Ct. 63

54 L.Ed. 120

HANOVER NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT, v. SUDDATH, AS RECEIVER OF AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF ABILENE (NO. 2).

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 29, 1909.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Percy S. Dudley for appellant.

Mr. Edward B. Whitney, with whom Mr. Francis F. Oldham was on the brief, for appellee.

MR. JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an outgrowth of a litigation between the same parties, which we have just decided in case No. 12, and we shall therefore refer to the banks as we did in No. 12, the one as the Abilene Bank and the other as the Hanover Bank. On October 11, 1906, in reversing the judgment entered in that action on the first trial in favor of the Hanover Bank, the Circuit Court of Appeals observed (149 Fed. Rep. 127, 130)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases