1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 200 U.S.
  5. 200 U.S. 148 (1906)
 

MEAD v. PORTLAND

No. 56.

200 U.S. 148 (1906)

26 S.Ct. 171

50 L.Ed. 413

MEAD v. PORTLAND.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 2, 1906.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles H. Carey, with whom Mr. C.E.S. Wood, Mr. S.B. Linthicum and Mr. J.C. Flanders were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. L.A. McNary, with whom Mr. J.P. Kavanaugh was on the brief, for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

If we determine what rights plaintiffs had in Morrison street and the river, we shall be able to determine their contentions. Plaintiffs claim a contract with the city based on the ordinances which authorize plaintiffs to construct their wharves, but they also claim rights which they say were attached to the property and reserved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases