1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 196 U.S.
  5. 196 U.S. 175 (1905)
 

SIXTO v. SARRIA

No. 40.

196 U.S. 175 (1905)

25 S.Ct. 186

49 L.Ed. 436

SIXTO v. SARRIA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 3, 1905.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. N.B.K. Pettingill for plaintiff in error.

There was no appearance or brief for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE DAY, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

It is evident from the foregoing statement of facts that the controversy, as it appeared in the United States District Court, was resolved into the question whether Adolfo Sixto, who had been duly adjudged the co-heir with Maria Belen of Manuel Sixto, deceased, was entitled to recover one-half of the amount due on the mortgage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases