1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 192 U.S.
  5. 192 U.S. 286 (1904)
 

SOUTH DAKOTA v. NORTH CAROLINA

No. 8. Original.

192 U.S. 286 (1904)

24 S.Ct. 269

48 L.Ed. 448

SOUTH DAKOTA v. NORTH CAROLINA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 1, 1904.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Wheeler H. Peckham, with whom Mr. R.W. Stewart was on the brief, for complainant.

Mr. Robert D. Gilmer, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, Mr. George Rountree, Mr. James E. Shepherd and Mr. James H. Merrimon for the defendant, State of North Carolina.

Mr. Daniel L. Russell, with whom Mr. Marion Butler and Mr. Alfred Russell were on the brief, for defendant Charles Salter and the second mortgage bondholders.

MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

There can be no reasonable doubt of the validity of the bonds and mortgages in controversy. There is no challenge of the statutes by which they were authorized. By those statutes the treasurer was directed, when it became necessary to borrow money for the payment of the subscription, to prepare coupon bonds and advertise in one or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases