1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 195 U.S.
  5. 195 U.S. 194 (1904)
 

AIKENS v. WISCONSIN

Nos. 3, 4, 5.

195 U.S. 194 (1904)

25 S.Ct. 3

49 L.Ed. 154

AIKENS v. WISCONSIN. HUEGIN v. WISCONSIN. HOYT v. WISCONSIN.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 7, 1904.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. W.H. Timlin and Mr. Goerge D. Van Dyke for plaintiffs in error in Nos. 3 and 4.

Mr. S.S. Gregory, with whom Mr. Conrad H. Poppenhusen and Mr. Joseph L. McNab were on the brief, for plaintiff in error, in No. 5.

Mr. James G. Flanders, with whom Mr. LaFayette M. Sturdevant, Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, was on the brief, for defendant in error in Nos. 3, 4. Submitted by Mr. Sturdevant, for defendant in error in No. 5.

MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the court.

These are three writs of error to the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, brought to set aside convictions and sentences of the plaintiffs in error, the defendants below, upon informations filed by the District Attorney. 113 Wisconsin, 419. The ground of the writs is that the proceedings violated the rights of the plaintiffs in error under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases